1990 P Cr (PLP)
MEHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1990 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MEHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 P Cr (PLP) (MEHMOOD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shamim Abbas Bukhari for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.307/452/148/149
Bail, grant of-- Injury attributed to accused had been declared simple
Accused was behind the bars for more than three months and his trial had not commenced so far
Cross version from accused side alleged that accused party was subjected to aggression by complainant party
One person from accused side had received a grievous injury at the hands of complainant party
Case against accused was thus of further inquiry
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.307/452/148/149
Bail, grant of-- Injury attributed to accused had been declared simple
Accused was behind the bars for more than three months and his trial had not commenced so far
Cross version from accused side alleged that accused party was subjected to aggression by complainant party
One person from accused side had received a grievous injury at the hands of complainant party
Case against accused was thus of further inquiry
Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances. Shamim Abbas Bukhari for Petitioner. Tasneem Amin for the State. The petitioner Mehmood has moved this petition for bail after arrest under section 497, Cr.P.C. in a case registered against him under section 307/452/148/149, P.P.C. at Police Station Saddar Chiniot District Jhang vide F.I.R. No.200, dated 18-5-1989.
2. The contention is that the petitioner while armed with a stick inflicted an injury on the shoulder of Salehon which injury has been declared simple by the doctor. Next contention is that the petitioner is behind the bars for the last three months. The learned counsel submits that there is cross-version in the case and that the petitioner side was also injured at the hands of the complainant party. The learned counsel maintains that a grievous injury was inflicted by the complainant party on the person of Sultan. Lastly, the learned counsel argues that this is a case of further inquiry. The learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is mentioned as an accused person in the F.I.R. and that specific role has been attributed to him.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record. The injury attributed to the petitioner has been declared simple by the doctor. The petitioner is behind the bars for the last more than three months and his trial has not commenced as yet. There is also a cross-version from the petitioner side and according to the allegations the accused party was subjected to aggression by the complainant party. Sultan from the accused side has received a grievous injury at the hands of the complainant party. In the circumstances of the case, in my view this is a case of further inquiry. The petitioner, therefore, is entitled to bail. He shall be admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.5J,0(N) (Rupees fifty thousand) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Chiniot. N.H.Q./M-2046/L Bail allowed.