1986 PLP 1147(1) (SCMR)
SADIQ SAYEED KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus CENTRAL GOVERNMENT through Defence Secretary and Military Estate Officer, Abbottabad and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1147(1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | SADIQ SAYEED KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus CENTRAL GOVERNMENT through Defence Secretary and Military Estate Officer, Abbottabad and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1147(1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1147(1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, C.J., Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1147(1) (SCMR) (SADIQ SAYEED KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus CENTRAL GOVERNMENT through Defence Secretary and Military Estate Officer, Abbottabad and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Maqbul Ellahi Malik, Bar-at-Law, Senior Advocate and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Munir A. Sheikh, Deputy Attorney-General and M.A. Siddiqi Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Respondent No.l.
- Date of hearing: 16th April, 1986.
- Maqbul Ellahi Malik, Bar‑at‑Law, Senior Advocate and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Munir A. Sheikh, Deputy Attorney‑General and M.A. Siddiqi Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondent No.l.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order dated 24-2-1986 of the Peshawar High Court, Circuit Bench at Abbottabad in R.F.A. 11 of 1986.)
Art. 185(3)--Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XLI, r.5--Execution of decree--Stay refused but execution ordered to be suspended if respondent deposited disputed amount in executing Court within a specified time which could be withdrawn on furnishing bank guarantee.
Judgment & Decree
MURAMMAD HALEEM, C.J‑‑The petition is converted into an appeal and allowed in terms that the execution shall not be stayed; but if the first respondent deposits the disputed amount amounting to Rs.10,00,000 in the executing Court within three months, the execution shall stand suspended. The petitioners shall be at liberty to withdraw the amount so deposited in the Court provided they furnish a bank guarantee in the like amount within three weeks of the date of deposit of the said amount. M.I. Order accordingly.