1987 P Cr (PLP)
ABBAS and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Rafiq, Tarar J |
| Parties | ABBAS and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Rafiq, Tarar J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (ABBAS and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Munawar Ahmad Waraich for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No allegation either of Zina or of abduction levelled against petitioner‑‑Petitioner allegedly kept watch while co‑accused committed Zina‑bil‑Jabr with prosecutrix‑‑Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Muhammad Rafiq for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No allegation either of Zina or of abduction levelled against petitioner‑‑Petitioner allegedly kept watch while co‑accused committed Zina‑bil‑Jabr with prosecutrix‑‑Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Munawar Ahmad Waraich for Petitioner. Muhammad Rafiq for the State. Abbas and Muhammad Ashraf petitioners have moved this petition for bail in a case registered against them and another under Article 10 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979.
2. The allegations are that on 12‑11‑1986 at Khuftan Wela co‑accused Asjid came to the house of Mst. Said Begum and told her that Ch. Imtiaz Ahmad had called her but she refused to accompany him. He left and then Abbas petitioner came to her and asked to her accompany him to the Dera of aforesaid Imtiaz as she had been called by him. He took her along under threats 'but instead of going to the dera of Imtiaz he took her near the graveyard where Asjid aforementioned and Muhammad Ashraf alias Achho petitioner were already present. Then Asjid and Abbas petitioner committed Zina‑bil‑Jabr with her while Achho remained on watch. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition on behalf of Abbas at this stage. He states that he will file a fresh application on his behalf after the receipt of the report of Chemical Examiner. About Muhammad Ashraf alias Achho he states that there is no allegation of Zina against him and the role assigned to him is unbelievable, therefore, a case for his enlargement is made out. The learned State counsel has, however, opposed the prayer for bail. Since there is no allegation either of Zina or of abduction against Muhammad Ashraf alias Achho petitioner, I admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Gujrat. S.G.D./A‑68/L Bail allowed.