1989 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Qurban Sadiq Ikram, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Zia Hussain for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art. 3/4‑‑Dangerous Drugs Act (II of 1930). S.8/14‑‑Bail‑‑Accused found in possession of 30 grams of Charas‑‑Accused no longer required for purpose of investigation and there was no likelihood of early completion of trial against him‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances. Muhammad Akram for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.78‑B of 1988, decided on 31st March, 1988. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Art. 3/4‑‑Dangerous Drugs Act (II of 1930). S.8/14‑‑Bail‑‑Accused found in possession of 30 grams of Charas‑‑Accused no longer required for purpose of investigation and there was no likelihood of early completion of trial against him‑‑Accused admitted to bail in circumstances. Syed Zia Hussain for Petitioner. Muhammad Akram for the State. This is a petition on behalf of Muhammad Ishaque for bail in a case under Articles 3/4 of President's Order 4 of 1979 and section 8/14 of Dangerous Drugs Act 1930. The allegation against him is that he was found in possession of 30 grams of Charas.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and have perused the record. It is admitted that the petitioner is no longer required for purposes of investigation. He was found in possession of only 30 grams of Charas. There is no likelihood of early completion of the trial against him. Muhammad Ishaque petitioner is accordingly admitted to bail on his furnishing of bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of. A.C./Duty Magistrate, Rawalpindi. M.Y.H./M‑962/L Bail granted.