1989 PLP (2) (SCMR)
BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus A.C., LAHORE and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP (2) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus A.C., LAHORE and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP (2) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP (2) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP (2) (SCMR) (BASHIR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus A.C., LAHORE and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 19th July, 1988.
- Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 9-9-1981 in Appeal No. 273/653 of 1980),
Art. 212(3)--Civil service--Dismissal of petitioner on corruption charge upheld by departmental authorities as well as by Service Tribunal after going through all relevant facts and having made sure that order of dismissal of petitioner was in accordance with law--Judgment of Tribunal not open to exception.
Judgment & Decree
Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 19th July, 1988. GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Bashir Ahmad son of Nur Muhammad, resident of Chhanga Manga, Tehsil Chunian District Kasur seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 9‑9‑1981. Bashir Ahmad was working as Patwari in Halqa Jia Musa Tehsil and District, Lahore. He was dismissed from service, on the charge of corruption, by order of the Assistant Commissioner, Saddar Lahore, dated 29‑1‑1980. The Commissioner Lahore Division rejected his appeal by order dated 12‑4‑1980 and same was the result when he went before Punjab Service Tribunal. Hence this petition. We have heard learned counsel appearing in support of this petition and have also gone through the judgment of the Tribunal. The Tribunal after going through all the relevant facts and having made sure that the order of dismissal of the petitioner was in accordance with law, rejected the appeal of the petitioner. We don't think the judgment of the Tribunal is open to any exception. M.Y.H./B‑71/S Petition dismissed.