1987 PLP 2184(2) (MLD)
MUHAMMAD KHAN and another Accused-Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent
| Citation | 1987 PLP 2184(2) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Naimuddin, C.J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD KHAN and another Accused-Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 2184(2) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 2184(2) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Naimuddin, C.J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 2184(2) (MLD) (MUHAMMAD KHAN and another Accused-Applicants Versus THE STATE — Opponent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S.498--Pre-arrest bail, grant of--Applicants could not surrender to Sessions Judge because Court was surrounded by Police--Applicants granted protective bail for two weeks to enable them to appear and surrender in Court of Sessions Judge, for applying bail. Qurban Ali Chohan for Applicants. A.A. Muhamedaly, A ddl. A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Bail Application No.554 of 1987, decided on 12th May, 1987.
S.498--Pre-arrest bail, grant of--Applicants could not surrender to Sessions Judge because Court was surrounded by Police--Applicants granted protective bail for two weeks to enable them to appear and surrender in Court of Sessions Judge, for applying bail. Qurban Ali Chohan for Applicants. A.A. Muhamedaly, A ddl. A.-G. for the State. This is an application for bail before arrest in Crime/FIR No.43/87 P.S. Tando Muhammad Khan. Learned Additional Advocate- General states that the applicants should have first moved the Sessions Judge Hyderabad. In reply it is submitted that the applicants could not surrender to the Sessions Judge Hyderabad because the Court was surrounded by police. Mr. Chohan further states that he has filed affidavit, in para.7 whereof he has stated this fact. In view of this submission learned Additional Advocate-General has no objection if the applicants are granted protective bail for two weeks. Accordingly I would grant the applicants bail in Crime/FIR No.43/87 of P.S. Tando Muhammad Khan in the sum of Rs.20,000/- each with P.R. bond in like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court to enable the applicants to appear and surrender in the Court of Sessions Judge and for applying to the said Court for bail on or before 26-5-1987. S.G.D./M-212/K Bail allowed.