1981 PLP 59 (CLC)
SALAH‑UD‑DIN‑Appellant Versus Hafiz MUHAMMAD ALAM‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 59 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SALAH‑UD‑DIN‑Appellant Versus Hafiz MUHAMMAD ALAM‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 59 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 59 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 59 (CLC) (SALAH‑UD‑DIN‑Appellant Versus Hafiz MUHAMMAD ALAM‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Nemo for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 149‑Court‑fee‑Payment of deficiency in court‑fee‑Deficiency in court‑fee on appeal made‑good under orders of Court‑Such appeal to be deemed to have been properly stamped at time it was originally filed‑Held, appeal could not be treated as time‑barred on ground that period of limitation had run out by time deficiency was made up‑Order of District Judge dismissing appeal as time‑barred set aside. [Court‑fee].
Judgment & Decree
Second Appeal from Original Order No. 174 of 1979, decided on 9th April 1980.
S. 149‑Court‑fee‑Payment of deficiency in court‑fee‑Deficiency in court‑fee on appeal made‑good under orders of Court‑Such appeal to be deemed to have been properly stamped at time it was originally filed‑Held, appeal could not be treated as time‑barred on ground that period of limitation had run out by time deficiency was made up‑Order of District Judge dismissing appeal as time‑barred set aside. [Court‑fee]. Jowala Singh and others v. Mst. Dhano and others 133 I C 122 rel. Iftikhar Ahmad Dar for Appellant. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing : 9th February 1980.