1980 P Cr (PLP)
GHULAM QADIR ETC‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
| Citation | 1980 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Aftab Farrukh, J |
| Parties | GHULAM QADIR ETC‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1980 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1980 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Aftab Farrukh, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1980 P Cr (PLP) (GHULAM QADIR ETC‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Rafiq Khan Chauhan and Ch. M. Abdul Wahid for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑S. 497‑Petitioner unarmed at time of occurrence and only shot on person of deceased attributed to co‑accused‑Allegation that petitioner caught hold of deceased‑Matter, held, required further enquiry as to presence of petitioner at place of occurrence‑Bail allowed, in circumstances. S. D. Qureshi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑S. 497‑Petitioner unarmed at time of occurrence and only shot on person of deceased attributed to co‑accused‑Allegation that petitioner caught hold of deceased‑Matter, held, required further enquiry as to presence of petitioner at place of occurrence‑Bail allowed, in circumstances. M. Rafiq Khan Chauhan and Ch. M. Abdul Wahid for Petitioners. S. D. Qureshi for the State. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was unarmed at the time of occurrence and the only shot on the person of the deceased even according to the prosecution is attributed to Basher co‑accused. The allegation against the petitioner is that he caught hold of the deceased.
2. I am of the opinion that it is a matter of further enquiry as to whether the petitioner was in fact present or he in fact caught hold of the deceased, bearing in mind the fact that the deceased has been killed by a firearm shot. In this view of the matter, I allow bail to the petitioner in the sum of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Gujrat. Bail allowed.