2006 PLP 1423(1) (YLR)
MUHARRAM ALI and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1423(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, J |
| Parties | MUHARRAM ALI and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1423(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1423(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1423(1) (YLR) (MUHARRAM ALI and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324
Further inquiry--Injured persons were not caused serious injuries and injuries were not sustained by injured on the vital part of the body
Enmity between the parties was apparent from the contents of F.I.R.
No empties were secured from the place of Vardat
Case of accused calling for further inquiry, they were granted bail. Noor Ahmed Memon for Applicants. Anwar Ansari for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, J.
The applicants are seeking bail in Crime No.131 of 2005, Police Station, Badin registered against them along with co-accused persons on the allegations of causing fire-arm injuries to Mitho and Ilyas as per report lodged by complainant Ahmed. Bail is pressed on the grounds that the injuries allegedly sustained by the applicants call for punishment of threeyears, there was no intention to commit murder of any body and that the applicants have been falsely implicated due to enmity. Learned State counsel has not seriously opposed the bail. The arguments have been considered and the material placed on record has been perused. Evidently, the injured persons were not caused serious injuries and that those are not sustained on the vital part of the body. The enmity is apparent from the contents of the F.I.R. No empties were secured from the place of Vardat. In the circumstances, the case of the applicants calls for further inquiry. The applicants are accordingly granted bail in the sum of Rs.100,000 (one hundred thousand) each and P.R. bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./M-49/K Bail granted.