1992 PLP 1851 (MLD)
MURAMMADNAWAZ ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1992 PLP 1851 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Sh. Riaz Ahmad, J |
| Parties | MURAMMADNAWAZ ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP 1851 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP 1851 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Sh. Riaz Ahmad, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP 1851 (MLD) (MURAMMADNAWAZ ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Mian Muhammad Akram Ranjha for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.497(2)‑‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.10/18‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.354‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑Initially challan against accused was submitted under S.10/18 of the Ordinance but on reinvestigation no such offence was found to have been made out against him and supplementary challan had been submitted against accused under W4, P.P.C.‑‑‑Case against accused was, thus, of further inquiry‑‑‑Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances. M. Saleem Shad for the State.
Judgment & Decree
A.S.I. states that initially challan against the petitioner was submitted under section 10/18 of the Hudood Ordinance, but on the application moved by the petitioner, the case was reinvestigated by the A.S.P., and now a supplementary challan has been submitted under section 354, P.P.C. as no case under section 10/18 of the Hudood Ordinance was made out.
2. In this view of the matter, I am of the view that it is a case of further! enquiry and is covered by section 497(2), Cr.P.C., therefore, the petitioner is admitted to bail provided he furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs. fifty thousand with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner Bhalwal. N.H.Q./M‑321/L Bail allowed.