2001 PLP 801 (YLR)
GHULAM ABBAS — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2001 PLP 801 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Roshan Essani, J |
| Parties | GHULAM ABBAS — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 801 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 801 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Roshan Essani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 801 (YLR) (GHULAM ABBAS — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss-337-A(i), (ii) 504 & 34
Application for confirmation-- Name of the accused transpired in the FI.R. and he had been ascribed the role of causing hatchet blow on the head of the injured which was vital part of the body and injury on the head of the injured had been declared "Shujja-e-Madiha " by the Medical Officer-- Motive had been disclosed in the F.LR.-- Considerations for grant of bail before arrest were different from the bail after arrest-- Merely because the offence was not punishable with death, imprisonment for life or ten years, was no ground for grant of bail in each and every case . Accused being not entitled to bail the order of interim pre-arrest bail granted to him was recalled. Abdul Razzak Siddiqui for Applicant. Muhammad Iqbal Memon on behalf of A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
The facts leading to present application for bail are that applicant/accused is facing trial in a criminal case before the learned Civil Judge and F.C.M.-II, Gambat under section 337-A(I)-(ii) read with sections 34 and 504, P.P.C. The case arose out of F.I.R. No.54 of 2000 of Police Station Sobhodero. The brief facts of the prosecution case as disclosed by the complainant Muhammad Chhutal in his F.I.R., dated 18-5-2000 are reproduced herein below:
"I report that there is dispute between me and Ghulam Abbas party over land. Yesterday in the evening, I and my brother Bahadur diverted the water in our land. We were watering the land when at about 12-30 in the night Ghulam Abbas,
2. Imam Bux,
3. Munir,
4. Hakim, all sons of Khuda Bux Kalhoro resident of Qaimuddin Kalhoro came. Ghulam Abbas had a hatchet and others had lathies in their hands. They abused us and said that as to why we are watering the land? We replied that the land belongs to us and they have no right to prevent us. Whereupon Ghulam Abbas caused back side hatchet blow to my brother Bahadur on his head and other accused caused stick blows which hit him on his head and other. parts of the body. They also caused me 'soti' blows. We raised cries, on which my brother Qurban Ali Kalhoro and other villagers came running. The accused on seeing them ran away towards their houses. I narrated the entire facts .to the P.Ws. Due to odd hours of night we stayed 'at home. In the morning, I alongwith my brother Bahadur proceeded for lodging the report. On the way one Mahesro son of Khuda Bux met us. He also abused us. Now I have come for report. The above named accused due to dispute over land have caused injuries to my brother Bahadur and to me. Justice be done. Letter be given." The applicant/accused applied for bail before arrest and his bail plea was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gambat by order, dated 4-7-2000. I have heard Mr. Abdul Razak Siddiqui, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/accused and Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Memon, learned counsel on behalf of A.-G. for the State. The latter opposes the bail plea of the applicant/accused. The perusal of material placed on record shows that the name of the applicant/accused transpires in the F.I.R.. and he has been ascribed role of causing hatchet blow on the head of the injured. The injury on the head of the injured has been declared Shajjah-e-Madihah by the Medical Officer. The head is vital part of the body. The motive has been disclosed in F.I.R. The considerations for grant of bail before arrest are different from the bail after arrest. Merely because the offence is not punishable with death, imprisonment for life or ten years, is no ground for grant of bail in each and every case. Consequently, I am of the considered view that the applicant/accused is not entitled to bail. The order of, interim prearrest bail granted to the applicant/accused on 21-2-2001 is hereby recalled and bail application stands dismissed. M.B.A./64-A/K Application allowed