2004 P Cr (PLP)
Malik MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2004 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Malik MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 P Cr (PLP) (Malik MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Zafar Iqbal Chohan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss-379/406
Accused, who was allowed ad interim bail, had investigation and there was no allegation against him for mis concession of bail
Offence alleged against accused did not fall t prohibitory clause of 5.497, Cr.P.C. and there was no chance abscondence
Ad interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused confirmed in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
S. 498
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss-379/406
Accused, who was allowed ad interim bail, had investigation and there was no allegation against him for mis concession of bail
Offence alleged against accused did not fall t prohibitory clause of 5.497, Cr.P.C. and there was no chance abscondence
Ad interim pre-arrest bail granted to accused confirmed in circumstances. Zafar Iqbal Chohan for Petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Younas for the Complainant. Sh. Khurshid Iqbal for the State. Date of hearing; 27th January, 2003. Malik Muhammad Ashraf son of Muhammad alias Soni approached this Court for grant of pre arrest bail in case F No.653 of 2002, dated 25-12-2002. registered with Police Station Ni Colony, Lahore under sections 379/406, P.P.C. at the instance of Hussain. The petitioner was allowed ad interim bail on 20-1-2003 and he has joined the investigation and there is no allegation for misusing of concession of bail. The alleged offence does not fall under the prohibitory clause and there is no chance of his absconding, therefore, ad interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner is confirmed subject to his furnishing fresh bail Bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. However, it is observed that if and when required the petitioner will join the investigation failing which the prosecution or the complainant may approach this Court for withdrawal of concession of bail. H.B.T./M-2430/L Ad interim bail confirmed.