P L D 1959 W (PLP)
GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus SULTAN MAHMOOD‑Respondent
| Citation | P L D 1959 W (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | H. A. Majid, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan |
| Parties | GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus SULTAN MAHMOOD‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Lambardar‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1959 W (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Lambardar‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1959 W (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: H. A. Majid, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1959 W (PLP) (GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus SULTAN MAHMOOD‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Kh. Abdur Rahim for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
Candidate whose landed property is too paltry cannot be appointed even though law of primogeniture be in his favour. Petitioner in person.
Judgment & Decree
The Collector's report makes quite clear that the landed property of the petitioner is too paltry to justify interference at the present stage. There is no doubt that the law of primogeniture is in favour of the petitioner but his holding was so small that the Collector had to pass over his claims. He has acquired a little more land after the Commissioner had dismissed his appeal, but even this acquisition does not help him to make his holding adequate. In the above circumstances, I dismiss this petition for revision. K. M. A. Petition dismissed.