2006 PLP 405 (MLD)
SHAKEEL AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 405 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SHAKEEL AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 405 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 405 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 405 (MLD) (SHAKEEL AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Munir Ahmad Khan Zai for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.380 & 411
No identification mark was put on the cash amount allegedly recovered from accused to link it with stolen property
Even otherwise offence under S.411, P.P.C. also did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C.
Case against accused being a matter of further inquiry, he was admitted to bail, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
SH. ABDUL RASHID, J.
The petitioner through this petition seeks bail after arrest in case F.I.R. No.106 dated 23-5-2005 under sections-380/411, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Jhang City.
2. According to the prosecution allegations , on the night of 29-6-2005 Rs.50,000 cash and other goods worth Rs.2,00,000 were stolen from the store of the complainant and consequently this case was registered at Police Station City Jhang in which the petitioner along with others was also suspected to be one of the culprits.
3. The petitioner was arrested in this case on 13-9-2005 and a sum of Rs.3,000 was recovered from his person. There is no identification mark on the cash amount allegedly recovered from the petitioner to link, it with the stolen property. Even otherwise the offence under section 411, P.P.C. also does not fall within the prohibitory clause; the case of the petitioner is a matter of further enquiry. He is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./S-14/L Bail granted.