1988 P Cr (PLP)
MANZOOR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1988 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | MANZOOR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 P Cr (PLP) (MANZOOR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ehtesham Qadir for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 11‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 452/324‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Notwithstanding expiry of statutory period of one year, case yet lying in pool and not entrusted for trial to any Court‑ Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Sh. Asghar for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 11‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 452/324‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Notwithstanding expiry of statutory period of one year, case yet lying in pool and not entrusted for trial to any Court‑ Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Ehtesham Qadir for Petitioner. Sh. Asghar for the State. This is an application for bail on behalf of Manzoor Hussain in a case under section 324/452, P.P.C. and Article 10/11 of the Offence of Zina (E.O.H.) Ordinance, 1979 registered on 13‑5‑1986. The petitioner alongwith 3 others stands charged with the abduction of Mst. Zubaida after causing injuries to Mst. Ghulam Fatima.
2. Bail is urged on the statutory ground, i.e non‑conclusion of the trial within the statutory period of one year. It is stated that the petitioner was arrested on 20‑5‑1986 and is in jail since then. A report was called from the Sessions Court about the progress of the trial. According to it the case is lying in pool and has not been entrusted for trial to any Court.
3. In view of the above circumstances, the application is granted and the petitioner is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C., Jhang. S.G.D./M‑738/L Bail allowed.