2006 PLP 1867 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 3 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 1867 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 3 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 1867 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 1867 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 1867 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 3 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mr. Mohammad Ayaz Soomro, learned Advocate for the applicants has argued that it is a case of counter versions and applicants' party has also lodged F.I.R. and the case has been registered against the complainant party (Crime No.66 of 2005) in which eight accused persons have been granted bail. It is contended by learned Advocate for the applicants that general allegations have been levelled against applicants.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324, 337-A(i), 337-F(i), 504, 114, 147, 148 & 149
No allegation had been levelled against two accused persons and allegation against the third accused was that he caused pistol blow to injured on his back which was not fatal according to medical report
Case was of counter version and both parties had registered case against each other
Accused persons having not caused any fatal injury to complainant party, they were admitted to bail, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN, J.
This bail, application has been filed on behalf of four applicants, who have been challaned under sections 302, 324, 337/A(i), 337/F(i), 504, 114, 147, 148, 149 P.P.C., in Crime No.65 of 2005. As per F.I.R. on 4-5-2005 complainant Gada Hussain stated that they have some quarrel with one Abdul Wahab on volleyball game. On which Abdul Wahab Mehessar and others were annoyed and on 5-5-2005 when complainant was sitting outside a shop along with his brother and nephew, applicants and other accused persons came there along with pistol and dandas and attacked them. The applicant No.1 caused sharp side hatchet blow to Ghulam Murtaza and applicant No.3 caused pistol blow to Waheed Ali on his back. In the F.I.R. the complainant party has nominated nine persons. Mr. Mohammad Ayaz Soomro, learned Advocate for the applicants has argued that it is a case of counter versions and applicants' party has also lodged F.I.R. and the case has been registered against the complainant party (Crime No.66 of 2005) in which eight accused persons have been granted bail. It is contended by learned Advocate for the applicants that general allegations have been levelled against applicants. Mr. Bhutto learned State Counsel, stated that both the parties received injuries and from the medical report it appears that Ghulam Murtaza received injury from hard blunt weapons, whereas allegation against him in the F.I.R. is that applicants had caused hatchet blow to him, which makes the case of two versions. No allegation has been levelled against applicants Nos.3 and
4. The allegation against Badaruddin, applicant No.2 is that he caused pistol blow to Abdul Wahab on his back and injury is not fatal according to Medical report. It is the case of counter version, both the parties have registered case against each other. The applicants have not caused any fatal injury to complainant party. The applicants are admitted to bail subject to furnishing sureties in the sum of Rs.100,000 (one lac) each and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. H.B.T./M-116/K Bail granted.