1983 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD AZIM‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
| Citation | 1983 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD AZIM‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1983 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1983 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1983 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD AZIM‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Hassan Ahmed Khan Kanwar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497‑Bail‑Allegation of rape against petitioner declared doubtful by three Investigation Agencies‑Matter requiring further inquiry‑Bail allowed‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10(3 ).
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2297‑B of 1981, decided on 2nd Septem ber, 1981.
S. 497‑Bail‑Allegation of rape against petitioner declared doubtful by three Investigation Agencies‑Matter requiring further inquiry‑Bail allowed‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10(3 ). Hassan Ahmed Khan Kanwar for Petitioner. Bashir Ahmed Beg for the State. This is an application for bail on behalf of Muhammad Azeem in a case under section 10 (3), Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordi nance, 1979 registered at Police Station Depalpur vide F.I.R. No. 177 dated 11th April, 1981. The allegations against the petitioner are that he com mitted Zina‑bil‑Jabar with Mst. Mukhoo on 11th May, 1981 at noon time in the area of village Mir Amanullah. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely involved in this case. During the investigation, the allegations against the petitioner were found doubtful. Muhammad Mohsin Head Constable has brought the police file and states that according to 3 Investigating Officers, the allegation of rape against the petitioner was declared to be doubtful. 2. In these circumstances, I am of the opinion that the matter requires further inquiry and petitioner who is in Jail since 30th May, 1981, is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Sahiwal. M.Y.M. Bail granted.