P L D 1979 Karachi 441 (PLP)
ABDUL GHAFOOR — Petitioner Versus SIND LABOUR COURT No. IV, KARACHI AND ANOTHER-
| Citation | P L D 1979 Karachi 441 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | Mushtak Alii Kazi, J |
| Parties | ABDUL GHAFOOR — Petitioner Versus SIND LABOUR COURT No. IV, KARACHI AND ANOTHER- |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1979 Karachi 441 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1979 Karachi 441 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Mushtak Alii Kazi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1979 Karachi 441 (PLP) (ABDUL GHAFOOR — Petitioner Versus SIND LABOUR COURT No. IV, KARACHI AND ANOTHER-). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. M. Pirzada for Petitioner,
- Nemo for Respondent No. 1.
- Afzal Nabi Qureshl for Respondent No. 2.,
- Date of hearing : 28th October 1978.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 25 A--Provision of S. 25-A, enabling provision and enacted for benefit of worker-Grievance notice under S. 25-A sent by individual worker through his lawyer-Held, cannot be deemed to be invalid or illegal so as to deprive worker of his benefits under labour laws. Dawood Hosiery Mills, Karachi v. Nazrat Muhammad Yousuf 1975 P L C 48 fol.
Judgment & Decree
Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑ S. 25 A‑‑Provision of S. 25‑A, enabling provision and enacted for benefit of worker‑Grievance notice under S. 25‑A sent by individual worker through his lawyer‑Held, cannot be deemed to be invalid or illegal so as to deprive worker of his benefits under labour laws. Dawood Hosiery Mills, Karachi v. Nazrat Muhammad Yousuf 1975 P L C 48 fol. M. M. Pirzada for Petitioner, Nemo for Respondent No.
1. Afzal Nabi Qureshl for Respondent No. 2., Date of hearing : 28th October 1978.