1969 PLP 28 (SCMR)
TANWEER ABBAS‑ Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, NAWARSHAH AND 2 OTHERS Respondents‑
| Citation | 1969 PLP 28 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Fazle‑Akbar, C. J. and Hamoodur Rahman, J |
| Parties | TANWEER ABBAS‑ Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, NAWARSHAH AND 2 OTHERS Respondents‑ |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1962) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1969 PLP 28 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1962) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1969 PLP 28 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Fazle‑Akbar, C. J. and Hamoodur Rahman, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1969 PLP 28 (SCMR) (TANWEER ABBAS‑ Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, NAWARSHAH AND 2 OTHERS Respondents‑). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Haji Muhammad Fazalur Rahman Khan; Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 10th October 1968.
Headnotes / Summary
(On review from the judgment and order of this Court, dated the 31st January 1968 in Civil‑ Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑89 of 1967).
Art. 62 and Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O. XXVI‑Review petition barred by time‑Mere poverty of petitioner‑No ground for condonation of delay‑Petition dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
Art. 62 and Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O. XXVI‑Review petition barred by time‑Mere poverty of petitioner‑No ground for condonation of delay‑Petition dismissed. Haji Muhammad Fazalur Rahman Khan; Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Wajid Hussain, Senior Attorney for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing : 10th October 1968. HAMOODUR RAHMAN, J.‑ This petition for review is out of time by 45 days. The petitioner admits that be had received a copy of the judgment of this Court on the 13th March 1968, but he could not file the petition for review till the 13th May 1968, as "it was beyond his means to arrange for expenses to file the Review Petition:" Mere poverty has: never, been considered to be a sufficient ground for the condonation of delay. In the circumstances we are not satisfied that any valid excuse for the delay has been given. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed as being barred by time. Petition dismissed.