2004 PLP 228 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ASLAM and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2004 PLP 228 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Munir A. Sheikh, Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ASLAM and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 228 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 228 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Munir A. Sheikh, Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 228 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ASLAM and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shahid Hussain Qadri, Advocate Supreme Court, Shehzad Shoukat, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate-on- Record for Petitioners.
- Ch. Nasim. Sabir, Additional A.-G. for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 2nd April, 2002.
- Zafarullah Cheema, Advocate Supreme Court with C.M. Latif, Advocate-on-Record for the Complainant.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 185(3)
Criminal Procedure. Code (V of 1898), S.426
Leave to appeal was granted to reappraise the evidence to satisfy whether the conviction recorded by the Courts below and the sentence awarded to the accused was sustainable
Sentence of accused who was 83 years of age at the time of occurrence and at present was 96 years old, was suspended and he was released on bail in view of leave to appeal having been granted in the case. Zafarullah Cheema, Advocate Supreme Court with C.M. Latif, Advocate-on-Record for the Complainant.
Judgment & Decree
Art. 185(3)
Criminal Procedure. Code (V of 1898), S.426
Leave to appeal was granted to reappraise the evidence to satisfy whether the conviction recorded by the Courts below and the sentence awarded to the accused was sustainable
Sentence of accused who was 83 years of age at the time of occurrence and at present was 96 years old, was suspended and he was released on bail in view of leave to appeal having been granted in the case. Shahid Hussain Qadri, Advocate Supreme Court, Shehzad Shoukat, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmed, Advocate-on- Record for Petitioners. Zafarullah Cheema, Advocate Supreme Court with C.M. Latif, Advocate-on-Record for the Complainant. Ch. Nasim. Sabir, Additional A.-G. for Respondents. Date of hearing: 2nd April, 2002. Leave-is granted to reappraise the evidence to satisfy whether the conviction recorded by the Courts below and sentence awarded to the petitioner is sustainable. Petitioner No. 3 is about 96 years old and when occurrence took place he was about 83 years. Leave has been granted to reappraise the evidence therefore, we suspend the sentence of petitioner' No.3 and he is allowed to be released on bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ' N.H.Q./M-440/S Leave granted.