1988 P Cr (PLP)
SHAH NAWAZ‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMEED BAJWA, S.H.O., POLICE STATION DINGA, DISTRICT, GUJRAT and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1988 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Manzoor Hussain Sial, J |
| Parties | SHAH NAWAZ‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMEED BAJWA, S.H.O., POLICE STATION DINGA, DISTRICT, GUJRAT and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Manzoor Hussain Sial, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 P Cr (PLP) (SHAH NAWAZ‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMEED BAJWA, S.H.O., POLICE STATION DINGA, DISTRICT, GUJRAT and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Q.M. Salim with Iftikhar Shah for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Apprehension of harassment‑‑Respondents police officials, transferred from concerned police station‑‑No apprehension of harassment at hands of respondents existing‑‑No action called for in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
The respondents have appeared in person and the report of the Superintendent of Police, Gujrat received in this case has been perused.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not denied that pursuant to raid committed by the police' on 1‑3‑1986 the petitioner was challaned under section 18 of Motion Pictures Ordinance, and stands convicted. The petitioner at this stage submitted that the respondents have been transferred from Police Station, Dinga, District Gujrat and there is no apprehension of his harassment from them.
3. In view of the report submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Gujrat and the statement of the petitioner that he has no, apprehension of harassment from the respondents, no further action is called for in the matter. This petition accordingly stands disposed of. S.A. / S‑258 / L Petition disposed of.