YLR 2010

2010 PLP 1753 (YLR)

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No.S-473 of 2009, decided on 21st December, 2009.
Honorable Judges
Ahmed Ali Shaikh, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2010 PLP 1753 (YLR)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Ahmed Ali Shaikh, J
Parties MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 1753 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 1753 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Ahmed Ali Shaikh, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 1753 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-F(iii), 452, 147, 148 & 149

House-trespassing and causing injuries--Interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of

No overt act was attributed to accused

Allegation levelled against co-accused did not find support from medical evidence in which only one injury had been shown

Allegation against accused was that he caused firearm injury, which had been opined by the Medico-Legal Officer as "Ghayr-Jaifah Mutalahimah", which was punishable upto three years and did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr. P. C.

Since the parties were at daggers drawn since long and prior to that incident two F.I.Rs. had been lodged by accused persons against the complainant, false implication of accused person, in circumstances, could not be ruled out

Medical evidence did not corroborate the ocular version of the prosecution, on the contrary, it negated the version of the complainant

No sanctity could be attached to the version of the complainant

Interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to accused, was confirmed, in circumstances. Meeran Bux v. The State and another PLD 1989 SC 347 rel. Riazat Ali Shah for Applicants. Shahid Ahmed Shaikh, Assistant Prosecutor-General Sindh.

Judgment & Decree

AHMED ALI SHAIKH, J.--Applicants Muhammad Nawaz, Ahsan Ali and Mehar Dil alias Meer Ven seek pre-arrest bail in Crime No.97 of 2009, Police Station Jamshoro, under sections 147, 148, 149, 452 and 337-F (iii), P.P.C.

2. Vide order dated 23-7-2009 the applicants were admitted on interim pre-arrest bail.

3. It is, inter alia, contended that applicants have been involved due to previous enmity between the parties, which is also admitted in the F.I.R. Learned counsel for the applicants has placed on record the copies of two F.I.Rs. bearing Nos.8 of 2007 and 140 of 2009 of Police Station Dodopur and Qassimabad respectively. It is further contended that the present F.I.R. was lodged as a counterblast against the applicants. Per medical certificate the injury received by the complainant has been declared as Ghay-r-Jaifah Mutalahimah, which falls under section 337-F(iii), P.P.C. and punishable upto three years and does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. Learned counsel further contended that the injury sustained by the complainant is on non-vital part of the body.

4. Mr. Shahid Ahmed Shaikh, learned Assistant Prosecutor-General Sindh vehemently opposed the bail plea of the applicants on the ground that they are nominated in the F.I.R. and they have been attributed specific role of causing injury to the complainant.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the papers available on record. Per F.I.R. at the time of incident applicant Mehar Dil was armed with Chhuri, whereas applicants Ahsan Ali and Muhammad Nawaz were armed with pistol along with two unknown persons having lathis and after abusing the complainant they caused kicks and fist blows to the complainant. Applicant Ahsan fired with his pistol, which hit at the left leg of the complainant; Applicant Mehar Dil caused Chhuri injury at the left shoulder of the complainant. So far the allegation against applicant M. Nawaz is concerned, no overt act is attributed to him. The allegation levelled against the applicant Mehar Dil did not find support from medical evidence in which only one injury has been shown. So far the case of applicant Ahsan is concerned, it is alleged that he caused fire-arm injury, which has been opined by the Medico-Legal Officers as Ghay-r-Jaifah Mutalahimah, which is punishable upto three years and does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. Since the parties are at daggers drawn since long and prior to this incident two F.I.Rs. as referred above, have been lodged by the applicants against the complainant, hencethe false implication of the applicants cannot be ruled out. However, the medical evidence does not corroborate the ocular version of the prosecution. On the contrary, it negates the version of the complainant hence no sanctity can be attached to the complainant's version.

6. In view of the above circumstances and following the dictum laid down by Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Meeran Bux v. The State and another PLD 1989 Supreme Court 347, where the accused was alleged to have caused fire-arm injury on the leg of the deceased, he was admitted on pre-arrest bail, I confirm the interim pre-arrest bail earlier granted to the applicant vide order dated 23-7-2009 on same terms and conditions. H.B.T./M-73/K Bail confirmed.