1968 SCMR 291 (1) (PLP)
ABDUL LATIF-Appellant Versus JAMAL DIN-Respondent
| Citation | 1968 SCMR 291 (1) (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | ORDER ON FACTS ONLY |
| Bench Members | S. A. Rahman, Hamoodur Rahman and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL LATIF-Appellant Versus JAMAL DIN-Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 SCMR 291 (1) (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 SCMR 291 (1) (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the ORDER ON FACTS ONLY bench comprising: S. A. Rahman, Hamoodur Rahman and Muhammad Yaqub Ali, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 SCMR 291 (1) (PLP) (ABDUL LATIF-Appellant Versus JAMAL DIN-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Muhammad Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Wall Muhammad Khawaja, Senior Attorney for Appellant.
- Gui Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Tanvir Ahmad, Attorney for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
(In the matter of restoration of stay order only) [ORDER ON FACTS ONLY]
Judgment & Decree
S. A. RAHMAN, J.-The learned counsel for the appellant states that the concise statement has now been filed and that the stay order previously granted may be revived. We consider that the previous stay order should not be revived in full force but in modified form. We direct that the proceedings should continue in the meantime, but no final order should be passed by the Court concerned until further orders. The Civil Appeal should now be posted for hearing as early as possible.