1981 PLP 1687 (CLC)
ABDUL KHALIQ AND 2 C9HERS‑Petitioners Versus GULAB DIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 1687 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Azad J & K |
| Bench Members | Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C. J. and Sardar Said |
| Parties | ABDUL KHALIQ AND 2 C9HERS‑Petitioners Versus GULAB DIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Pakistan Rehabilitation Act (XLII of 1956)‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 1687 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Pakistan Rehabilitation Act (XLII of 1956)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 1687 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Azad J & K bench comprising: Sardar Muhammad Sharif Khan, Actg. C. J. and Sardar Said.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 1687 (CLC) (ABDUL KHALIQ AND 2 C9HERS‑Petitioners Versus GULAB DIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh. Abdul Aziz for Petitioners.
- M.S., Farooqi for Respondent No. 1.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑S. 1l‑Allotment‑ Review‑Custodian having no authority to cancel allotment of petitioners and to restore that of respondents (cancelled by a Rehabilitation Authority subordinate to Rehabilita tion Commissioner), order of Custodian held, void, ab initio and order of Rehabilitation Commissioner dismissing review petition with out only going into merits on strength of illegal order of Custodian set aside and proceedings before him revived for proceeding accord ing to law.‑[Review]. Nemo for the Custodian.. Date of institution : 31st December, 1980.
Judgment & Decree
GULAB DIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents Writ Petition No. 52 of 1980, decided on 10th June, 1981. --‑‑S. 1l‑Allotment‑ Review‑Custodian having no authority to cancel allotment of petitioners and to restore that of respondents (cancelled by a Rehabilitation Authority subordinate to Rehabilita tion Commissioner), order of Custodian held, void, ab initio and order of Rehabilitation Commissioner dismissing review petition with out only going into merits on strength of illegal order of Custodian set aside and proceedings before him revived for proceeding accord ing to law.‑[Review]. Sh. Abdul Aziz for Petitioners. M.S., Farooqi for Respondent No.
1. Nemo for the Custodian.. Date of institution : 31st December, 1980.