1993 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD IMTIAZ and another — Petitioners Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES,
| Citation | 1993 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD IMTIAZ and another — Petitioners Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES, |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD IMTIAZ and another — Petitioners Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINES,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Kh. Muhammad Sharif for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 365
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition-- Alleged abdudee not only as per F.I.R. itself, but also before Court, had herself stated that she had entered into marriage with accused lawfully and that nobody had abducted her what to speak of forcibly- --Prosecution having failed to advance any reason as to why accused could be held guilty of offence mentioned in F.I.R., case registered against accused was quashed, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
Writ Petition No.10247 of 1992, decided on 3rd November, 1992.
S. 365
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition-- Alleged abdudee not only as per F.I.R. itself, but also before Court, had herself stated that she had entered into marriage with accused lawfully and that nobody had abducted her what to speak of forcibly- --Prosecution having failed to advance any reason as to why accused could be held guilty of offence mentioned in F.I.R., case registered against accused was quashed, in circumstances. Kh. Muhammad Sharif for Petitioners. Mansoor Alam Qazi, A.A.-G. for the State. A case under section 365, P.P.C., was registered against the petitioner (No.1) with Police Station Civil Lines, Lahore, vide F.I.R. No.311 of 1992, dated the 17th of September, 1992.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had forcibly abducted petitioner No.2 with an intention to kill her.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that as per the F.I.R. itself, the complainant herself disclosed that petitioner No.2 was lawfully married to petitioner No.l when the alleged abductee's father was alive and suffering from cancer. The learned AA.-G. when confronted with this part of the F.I.R. could not advance any reason why the petitioners could be held guilty of the offence mentioned therein. To cap it all, last but not the least was the petitioner No.2's statement made before me that she had entered into marriage with petitioner No.l lawfully, and that nobody had abducted her what to speak of forcibly. Therefore, the petition is accepted and the case registered vide F.I.R. No311/92, dated 17th of September, 1992, with Police Station Civil Lines, Lahore is ordered to be quashed. H.B.T./M-679/L Petition allowed.