SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 1664 (SCMR)

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/SALES TAX — Petitioner Versus O.K. MOTORS COMPANY — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 224-K, 225-K and 226-K of 1985, decided on 12th June, 1986.
Honorable Judges
Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 1664 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ
Parties COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/SALES TAX — Petitioner Versus O.K. MOTORS COMPANY — Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1664 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1664 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Abdul Kadir Shaikh and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1664 (SCMR) (COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/SALES TAX — Petitioner Versus O.K. MOTORS COMPANY — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

Representation

  • Muzaffar Hassan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner (in all Cases)
  • Nemo for Respondent (in all Cases).
  • Date of hearing: 12th June, 1986.
  • Muzaffar Hassan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in all Cases)

Headnotes / Summary

Art. 185(3)--Questions of law raised in petitions identical to those in other petitions where leave to appeal had been granted--Petitions allowed.

Judgment & Decree

ABDUL KADIR SHAIKH, J.‑‑The questions of law raised in these three petitions are identical to those in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 372‑K and 373‑K of 1984 Commissioner of Incometax Karachi v . Pakistan Fisheries Limited in which leave to appeal has been granted. We, therefore, grant leave in these petitions also. Appeal arising out of these petitions will be heard on the same record alongwith connected appeals. It is however open to the parties to file additional documents, if any. M. Y. H. Leave granted.