1993 PLP 1748 (MLD)
KHALID MAHMOOD alias KHALID MOOSA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1993 PLP 1748 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | KHALID MAHMOOD alias KHALID MOOSA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 1748 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 1748 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 1748 (MLD) (KHALID MAHMOOD alias KHALID MOOSA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Khan Muhammad Taqi Khan for Petitioner.
- The admitted position in the case is that a complete challan was submitted for trial of the petitioner before the learned trial Judge under Article 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 and enquiry proceedings are also tending before the learned Magistrate. The learned A Advocate-General, Punjab, has no objection if a direction is given to the learned enquiry officer to conclude the enquiry as early as possible. In the given circumstances, a direction shall issue to the learned enquiry officer to conclude the enquiry within next ten days without fail. On completion of the enquiry proceedings, the learned enquiry officer shall submit his report to the learned trial Judge. Needless to observe that the learned trial Judge shall not bring the trial to an end before the enquiry proceedings are completed. With this observation, this petition is disposed of.
Headnotes / Summary
S.561-A
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4,of 1979), Art.3/4-- Complete challan had been submitted before the Trial Court for trial of the accused and enquiry proceedings were also pending before the Magistrate-- Enquiry Officer in the circumstances was directed to conclude the enquiry within ten days and submit his report to the Trial Court who would not bring the trial to an end before the enquiry proceedings were completed
Petition was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
S.561-A
Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4,of 1979), Art.3/4-- Complete challan had been submitted before the Trial Court for trial of the accused and enquiry proceedings were also pending before the Magistrate-- Enquiry Officer in the circumstances was directed to conclude the enquiry within ten days and submit his report to the Trial Court who would not bring the trial to an end before the enquiry proceedings were completed
Petition was disposed of accordingly. Khan Muhammad Taqi Khan for Petitioner. Maqbool Elahi Malik, A.-G. with M. lqbal Vehniwal for the State Date of hearing: 12th October, 1992. The admitted position in the case is that a complete challan was submitted for trial of the petitioner before the learned trial Judge under Article 3/4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 and enquiry proceedings are also tending before the learned Magistrate. The learned A Advocate-General, Punjab, has no objection if a direction is given to the learned enquiry officer to conclude the enquiry as early as possible. In the given circumstances, a direction shall issue to the learned enquiry officer to conclude the enquiry within next ten days without fail. On completion of the enquiry proceedings, the learned enquiry officer shall submit his report to the learned trial Judge. Needless to observe that the learned trial Judge shall not bring the trial to an end before the enquiry proceedings are completed. With this observation, this petition is disposed of. N.H.Q./K-76/L Order accordingly.