1987 PLP 1395(1) (MLD)
Mst. AMINA BEGUM and 13 others — Appellants Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE and 11 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1395(1) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Saad Saood Jan and Riaz Ahmad, JJ |
| Parties | Mst. AMINA BEGUM and 13 others — Appellants Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE and 11 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1395(1) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1395(1) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Saad Saood Jan and Riaz Ahmad, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1395(1) (MLD) (Mst. AMINA BEGUM and 13 others — Appellants Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE and 11 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rana Muhammad Sarwar Khan for Appellants.
- Ch. Qamarud Din Khan Meo for Respondents Nos.3 to 12.
- Date of hearing: 26th April, 1986.
Headnotes / Summary
S.10--Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972) S .3 (2), proviso- Intra-Court appeal--At the time order was passed it was revisable by High Court and one of petitioners did avail this right- -Intra-Court appeal in circumstances was hit by proviso to S.3(2), therefore, dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--The basic order impugned in this Intra Court Appeal was made on 21-9-1967. At the time this order was passed it was revisable by the High Court. In fact one of the petitioners did avail of this right but his revision petition was dismissed by the High Court. That being so, this Intra-Court Appeal is hit by the proviso to section 3(2) of the Law Reforms Ordinance. It is dismissed as such. There will be no order as to costs. M.A. K./A-145/L Intra-Court Appeal dismissed.