SCMR 1968

1968 PLP 1282 (SCMR)

GHULAM RASOOL AND 4 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE COLLECTOR, SARGODHA AND ANOTHER -Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 169 of 1968, decided on 21st June 1968.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1968 PLP 1282 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties GHULAM RASOOL AND 4 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE COLLECTOR, SARGODHA AND ANOTHER -Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1962)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968 PLP 1282 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1962) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968 PLP 1282 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1968 PLP 1282 (SCMR) (GHULAM RASOOL AND 4 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE COLLECTOR, SARGODHA AND ANOTHER -Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1962)

Representation

  • Ch. Azimuddin, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Abdul Karim, Attorney for Petitioners.
  • Nemo for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing : 21st June 1968.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore, dated the 19th March 1968, in Writ Petition No. 395 of 1967). - Art. 58 (3)‑Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal on points already covered by a previous decision of Supreme Court Leave refused. JUDGMENT FAZLE‑AKBAR, C. J.‑The High Court has rightly held that the points raised in this case are fully covered by the decision of this Court in Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1967 (Ghulam Muhammad and another v. The Board of Revenue and another). This misconceived petition is, therefore, dismissed. Leave refused.

Judgment & Decree

FAZLE‑AKBAR, C. J.‑The High Court has rightly held that the points raised in this case are fully covered by the decision of this Court in Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1967 (Ghulam Muhammad and another v. The Board of Revenue and another). This misconceived petition is, therefore, dismissed. Leave refused.