2017 PLP 1026 (CLD)
MOHAMMAD IQBAL KHAWAJA — Appellant Versus IMTIAZ HAIDER, DIRECTOR (SMD), SECP and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2017 PLP 1026 (CLD) |
| Forum / Court | Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MOHAMMAD IQBAL KHAWAJA — Appellant Versus IMTIAZ HAIDER, DIRECTOR (SMD), SECP and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2017 PLP 1026 (CLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2017 PLP 1026 (CLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2017 PLP 1026 (CLD) (MOHAMMAD IQBAL KHAWAJA — Appellant Versus IMTIAZ HAIDER, DIRECTOR (SMD), SECP and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ms. Asima Wajid, Deputy Director (SMD) for Respondent No.1.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 33
Dismissal of appeal for non-appearance and non-prosecution by the appellant
Appeal was fixed for hearing previously on three dates, which was adjourned on the request of the appellant
Appeal was re-fixed for hearing, but no one appeared on behalf of the appellant
Final opportunity of hearing was provided to the appellant in the interest of justice
Appeal was called on adjourned date of hearing at 10.00 a.m., departmental representative was present, but no one appeared on behalf of the appellant and no request for adjournment was received by the office
Matter was kept pending till the close of office timings, but, the appellant failed to enter appearance
Conduct of the appellant showed that appellant was not interested in pressing the appeal
Appeal was dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution, in circumstances.
Judgment & Decree
1. This order shall dispose of Appeal No. 30 of 2006 filed under section 33 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (the "Commission") Act, 1997 against the order dated 7/02/06 (the "Impugned Order") passed by the Respondent No.1. The appeal was fixed for hearing previously on 11/10/11, 15/11/11, 11/1/12, which were adjourned on the request of the Appellant. The appeal was re-fixed for hearing on 1/1/15, however no one appeared on behalf of the Appellant. In the interest of justice a final opportunity of hearing was provided to the Appellant on 9/3/15. The appeal was called for hearing at 10:00 am; the department representative was present, however, no one appeared on behalf of the Appellant before the Bench and no request for adjournment was received by this office. The matter was kept pending till the close of official timings however the Appellant failed to enter appearance despite repeated calls. From the conduct of the Appellant it appears that he is not interested in pressing the present Appeal, therefore, the Appeal is dismissed for non-appearance and non-execution.
2. Parties to bear their own cost. HBT/61/SEC Appeal dismisse