1990 PLP 518 (SCMR)
ABDUL RAZZAQ‑‑petitioner Versus THE STATE‑ Respondent
| Citation | 1990 PLP 518 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Shariat Appellate Bench |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah, Pir Muhammad Karam Shah and Maulana Muhammad Taqi Usmani, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL RAZZAQ‑‑petitioner Versus THE STATE‑ Respondent |
| Primary Law | Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 518 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 518 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Shariat Appellate Bench bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah, Pir Muhammad Karam Shah and Maulana Muhammad Taqi Usmani, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 518 (SCMR) (ABDUL RAZZAQ‑‑petitioner Versus THE STATE‑ Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch.Muhammad Ashraf, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbool Ahmad Oadri, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 28th June, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 15‑5‑1988 of the Federal Shariat Court in Criminal Appeal No.44‑L of 1988). ‑‑‑Art.3 & 4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.203‑F‑‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider that the sample found by Chemical Examiner to contain heroin was a sample sent in some other case with different Docket number and not the sample taken out from the alleged heroin, which was recovered from accused and sent to the Chemical Examiner for examination. Nemo for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art.3 & 4‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.203‑F‑‑‑Leave to appeal granted to consider that the sample found by Chemical Examiner to contain heroin was a sample sent in some other case with different Docket number and not the sample taken out from the alleged heroin, which was recovered from accused and sent to the Chemical Examiner for examination. Ch.Muhammad Ashraf, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana Maqbool Ahmad Oadri, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner. Nemo for the State. Date of hearing: 28th June, 1989. NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑The contention is that the sample found by the chemical examiner to contain heroin is not the sample taken out from the alleged heroin which was recovered from Abdul Razzaq, petitioner and sent to the chemical examiner for examination. In this connection, it is submitted that the sample recovered from the petitioner was sent through Docket No.333 whereas the report sent by the chemical examiner shows that the sample which was found to contain heroin was sent to him through Docket No.004‑E dated 5‑2‑1985. The contention that the sample found to contain heroin was a sample sent in some other case requires consideration. Leave granted. Early date. M.A.K./A‑600/S Leave granted.