1996 PLP 24 (PLC)
MUHAMMAD YOUSUF Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT, KARACHI and another
| Citation | 1996 PLP 24 (PLC) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh |
| Bench Members | Mushtak Ali Kazi, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YOUSUF Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT, KARACHI and another |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996 PLP 24 (PLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996 PLP 24 (PLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Mushtak Ali Kazi, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1996 PLP 24 (PLC) (MUHAMMAD YOUSUF Versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER, IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT, KARACHI and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Gohar Iqbal for Appellant.
- Sher Afgan for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 28th August, 1995.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 25-A
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O. 15(3)(1)
Dismissal from service-- Employee was dismissed from service after issuing him charge-sheet and holding enquiry against him on charge that he used to be late at his work due to one reason or the other
Employee did not deny allegations against him, but simply stated that he was being proceeded against on account of his union activities
Employee having failed to prove that he had been dismissed from service on account of alleged union activities he was rightly dismissed from service on ground of being habitual late comer.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S. 25‑A‑‑‑West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.O. 15(3)(1)‑‑‑Dismissal from service‑‑ Employee was dismissed from service after issuing him charge‑sheet and holding enquiry against him on charge that he used to be late at his work due to one reason or the other‑‑‑Employee did not deny allegations against him, but simply stated that he was being proceeded against on account of his union activities‑‑‑Employee having failed to prove that he had been dismissed from service on account of alleged union activities he was rightly dismissed from service on ground of being habitual late comer. Gohar Iqbal for Appellant. Sher Afgan for Respondents. Date of hearing: 28th August, 1995. This appeal arises from the order of the Fourth Sindh Labour Court, Karachi whereby the petitioner's Application under section 25‑A of the I.R.O. for reinstatement was dismissed.
2. It was the case of the respondent Engineering Industries that the appellant a turner in the Workshop had the habit of remaining absent during entire period of four years. He was accordingly charge‑sheeted and a domestic enquiry was conducted against him for violating the rules. The appellant denied the charges during the enquiry and alleged that he was being proceeded against on account of union activities and that he was absent because of his mother's illness. The appellant during the trial in the Labour Court did not deny the allegations that he used to attend his work late due to one or the other reason. As regards the allegations of union activities they have not been proved by the appellant.
3. There is no substance in this appeal which is dismissed. H.B.T./2494/Lb.S Appeal dismissed.