PCRLJ 1968

1968S3184 (PLP)

N/A

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
N/A
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1968S3184 (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members N/A
Parties N/A
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1968S3184 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1968S3184 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1968S3184 (PLP) (N/A). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • S. Muhammad Ali Zaidi, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by S. Inayat Hussain, Attorney for Petitioners.

Judgment & Decree

S. A. RAHMAN, C. J.‑

The two petitioners, Gulzar and Muhammad Hussain, were convicted under section 307/109 of the Pakistan Penal Code, by the trial Magistrate, who sentenced the former to three years' rigorous imprisonment and the latter to four years' rigorous imprisonment. On appeal, the convictions of the petitioners were upheld, but the sentence of Gulzar was reduced to that of six months' rigorous imprisonment. Otherwise the order of the trial Magistrate was left unmodified. The petitioners challenged their convictions and sentences by a revision petition in the High Court of West Pakistan but were un successful. They now seek special leave to appeal from the order of the High Court. The questions raised for consideration by Mr. Muhammad Ali Zaidi merely go to the appreciation of the evidence on which the convictions of the petitioners rest and which has been accepted as trustworthy by the Courts below. This Court normally does not undertake re‑appraisal of the evidence which has found acceptance as reliable by lower Courts. No point of law such as would justify grant of special leave to appeal in this case arises for consideration and we dismiss the petition. Leave refused.