1989 PLP (1) (SCMR)
NOOR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR‑GENERAL POLICE and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP (1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | NOOR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR‑GENERAL POLICE and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP (1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP (1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP (1) (SCMR) (NOOR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR‑GENERAL POLICE and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Rao Muhammad Yousaf Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 3rd August, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 2‑3‑1983 in Appeal No.61/1665 of 1982). ‑‑‑Art.212(3)‑‑Petitioner filed appeal before Service Tribunal against order of his dismissal from service with request that he may also be given promotion b~, maintaining his seniority‑‑Service Tribunal dismissed the appeal after considering relevant rules applicable to the case of petitioner as well as by referring to a decision of Supreme Court‑‑No error of law was found in the judgment of the Service Tribunal‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Noor Ahmad Constable No.357 filed appeal before the Punjab Service Tribunal against the order of his dismissal from service passed by the Deputy Inspector‑General of Police. He also requested the Tribunal that he may be given promotion as Head Constable by maintaining his A seniority. The Tribunal by judgment, dated 2‑3‑1983 dismissed the appeal. This order was passed after considering the relevant rules applicable to the case of the petitioner as well as by referring to a decision of this Court mentioned in the judgment of the Tribunal. Noor Ahmad has come to this Court praying that leave be granted against the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner but we have not come across any error of law so as to justify interference in the impugned judgment. Dismissed. M.B.A./N‑154/S Leave refused.