2004 PLP 2036(1) (YLR)
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2004 PLP 2036(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Soomro, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 2036(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 2036(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Soomro, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 2036(1) (YLR) (MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and another‑‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S. 426‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.379‑‑‑Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.14‑‑‑Suspension of, sentence‑‑ Sentence awarded to accused was short being nine months and there was no likelihood of revision application to be heard and decided in a foreseeable future‑‑ Sentence was suspended and accused were directed to be released on bail. Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicants. Anwar H. Ansari for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Abdul Rasool Abbasi for Applicants. Anwar H. Ansari for the State.
1. Deferred for the time being.
2. Adjourned.
3. By this application, learned counsel for the applicants has approached this Court for suspension of sentence awarded to the applicants. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the sentence is short i.e. to the extent of nine months and there is no likelihood of the revision application to be heard and decided in a foreseeable future. In the circumstances the application is granted, sentence is suspended and the applicants are directed to be released on bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 each and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Additional Registrar of this Court. Miscellaneous Appeal No.295 of 2004 stands disposed of. H.B.T./M‑62/K Sentence suspended.