1990 PLP 520 (SCMR)
Messrs KHAWAJA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. and another‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 520 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zillah and S. Usman Ali Shah, JJ |
| Parties | Messrs KHAWAJA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. and another‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 520 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 520 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zillah and S. Usman Ali Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 520 (SCMR) (Messrs KHAWAJA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. and another‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Akram Khwaja, Advocate (absent) and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in all Petitions).
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 24th June; 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgments of the Lahore High Court dated 28th May, 1989 and 16th May, 1989 in Writ Petitions Nos.92/1986, 207/1985, 373/1985 and in Writ Petition No.70 of 1988). ‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal had already been granted in similar other matters, points involved therein being similar to those raised in these petitions‑‑‑Leave to appeal was thus granted in all the present petitions.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal had already been granted in similar other matters, points involved therein being similar to those raised in these petitions‑‑‑Leave to appeal was thus granted in all the present petitions. Muhammad Akram Khwaja, Advocate (absent) and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners (in all Petitions). Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 24th June; 1989. MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Learned counsel states that leave to appeal has already been granted in similar other matters. He also states that the points involved therein and those to be raised in these petitions are similar. Accordingly we grant leave. to appeal in these four petitions also. The security and interim order same as was passed in Civil Petition No.144‑R of 1988 and other connected petitions decided on 1st June, 1988. AA./K‑112/S Order accordingly.