1989 P Cr (PLP)
SALIM ULLAH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | SALIM ULLAH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (SALIM ULLAH‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sardar Ahmad Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts. 3 & 4‑ Bail, grant of‑‑Alleged offence being punishable with 2 years' R.I. only and accused who was in jail for more than 6 months no more required for investigation‑‑Case for grant of bail to accused thus was made out. Nazir Ahmad Bhatti for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Sardar Ahmad Khan for Petitioner. Nazir Ahmad Bhatti for the State. This is an application for grant of bail to Salim Ullah petitioner in a case under Article 3/4, Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979, registered at P.S. Zahirpir, vide F.LR. No. 57/88.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner was found in possession of 14 Kg. of Charas and opium weighing 20 Kg. on 22‑3‑1988.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offence being punishable with 2 years' R.I. is bailable and in any case does not fall within prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. 1 find that the alleged offence is punishable with 2 years' R.I. and that the petitioner is in jail since 22‑3‑1988 and no more required for investigation. For what has been said above, I feel that a case for grant of bail to the petitioner has been made out. He will be released on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 (Rupees one lac) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Khanpur. H.B.T./S‑332/L Bail granted.