2009 PLP 864 (MLD)
SIKANDAR ALI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 PLP 864 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SIKANDAR ALI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 864 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 864 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 864 (MLD) (SIKANDAR ALI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Unexplained delay of thirty four days in lodging F.I.R.
Trial Court had not given explicit reason for rejecting bail and that was no ground that if accused was granted bail, then recovery of the crime property would become difficult; or that the absconding accused would not be arrested
Accused was behind the bars for the last more than eight months
State counsel had conceded to the bail due to fact that of abnormal delay with no recovery
Judgment & Decree
MUNIB AHMAD KHAN, J.
Learned counsel submits that the accused/applicant has been involved falsely and that there is unexplained delay of thirty-four days in lodging the F.I.R., as according to the complainant, they were approaching the accused persons for return of the motorcycle. He further submits that the learned Trial Court has not given explicit reason for rejecting the bail and this is no ground that if the applicant is granted bail then recovery of the crime property will become difficant or that the absconding accused will not be arrested. He furthers submits that the accused is behind the bars for the last more than eight months. Mr. Mushaq Ahmed Abbasi, learned Assistant A.G., conceded to the bail due to fact that abnormal delay is there with no recovery. In the circumstances, the applicant is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.100,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Bail after arrest granted. H.B.T./S-118/K Bail grante