PCRLJ 1986

1986 P Cr (PLP)

JEHANGIR Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No. 294 of 1985, decided on 21st August, 1985.
Honorable Judges
Saeeduzzaman Siddiqi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Saeeduzzaman Siddiqi, J
Parties JEHANGIR Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Saeeduzzaman Siddiqi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (JEHANGIR Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/307/148/149/457‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly armed with revolver but overpowered before using same‑‑Accused in jail for about one year without trial‑‑Applicant allowed bail, in circumstances. S. Aijaz Ali Shah for Applicant. Zawar Hussain Jafferi, A.A.‑G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Criminal Bail Application No. 294 of 1985, decided on 21st August, 1985. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/307/148/149/457‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Accused allegedly armed with revolver but overpowered before using same‑‑Accused in jail for about one year without trial‑‑Applicant allowed bail, in circumstances. S. Aijaz Ali Shah for Applicant. Zawar Hussain Jafferi, A.A.‑G. for the State. Jahangir son of Moula Bux has applied for bail in a case which is registered against him under sections 302, 307, 457, 148, 149, P.P.C. and 13 (d), Arms Ordinance. The allegation against the present accused in the F.I.R. is that he was armed with the revolver but he was overpowered before he could use the firearm by the inmates of the house. The allegations as they stand in the F.I.R. prima facie disclose a case under section 457, P. P. C. against the present accused for which the maximum punishment is five years. The accused was arrested on 23‑8‑1984 and has almost completed one year detention without any trial. I accordingly admit him to bail in the sum of Rs.30,000 with one surety and P.R. in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. S.G.D. Bail allowed.