MLD 1997

1997 PLP 217 (MLD)

ABDUL KHALIQ and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1826‑B of 1994, decided on 19th December, 1994.
Honorable Judges
Riaz Hussain, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1997 PLP 217 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Riaz Hussain, J
Parties ABDUL KHALIQ and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1997 PLP 217 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1997 PLP 217 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Riaz Hussain, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1997 PLP 217 (MLD) (ABDUL KHALIQ and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi for Petitioners.
  • Date of hearing: 19th December, 1994.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S,X37‑A(ii)/337‑A(iii)/337‑F(v)/148/149‑‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑‑One injured witness had sustained simple injuries whereas the other injured witness although had suffered a fracture of her left arm yet it was on the non‑vital part of her body‑‑‑Offence against the accused did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497(1), Cr.P.C.‑‑‑Accused were admitted to bail in circumstances. Muhammad Iqbal Khichi, A.A. ‑G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

The petitioners Abdul Khaliq, Muhammad Iqbal and Muhammad Arif seek bail in a case F.I.R. No.157/94 dated 7‑6‑1994 for the offences under sections 337‑A(iii)/337‑A(ii), 337‑F(v), 148/149, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Mirtu, District Vehari.

2. The prosecution story in brief is that the petitioner Abdul Khaliq gave a Sota blow which injured Mst. Gulzar Mai on her left arm; Muhammad Iqbal and Muhammad Arif gave one Sota blow each which landed on the head of Manzoor Hussain.

3. I have heard both the learned counsel and perused the record.

4. The injuries on the person of Manzoor Hussain have been declared simple. Although there was a fracture on the left arm of Mst. Gulzar Mai yet it was on her non‑vital part of the body. Admittedly the offence against the petitioner does not falls within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. I, therefore, feel inclined to admit the petitioners to bail subject to furnishing their bail bonds in the sum of Rs.30,000 (Rupees thirty thousand only) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./District Magistrate, Mailsi. N.H.Q./A‑86/L Petition accepted.