YLR 2000

2000 PLP 2934 (YLR)

QADEER AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2981‑B of 2000, decided on 13th June, 2000.
Honorable Judges
Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2000 PLP 2934 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry, J
Parties QADEER AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal. Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP 2934 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal. Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP 2934 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP 2934 (YLR) (QADEER AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal. Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Hasnat Ahmad Khan for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/109/34‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Injuries suffered by the injured prosecution witness which were specifically ascribed to the accused fell according to medical report within the ambit of 5.337‑L(1) & (2), P.P.C. which entailed a maximum sentence of seven years' R.I. ‑‑‑Case of accused, therefore, was not hit by the prohibitory clause of S.497(1), Cr.P.C.‑‑ Accused was released on bail in circumstances. M. Jahangir Wahla, A.A.‑G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑‑‑S.497‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/109/34‑‑‑Bail‑‑‑Injuries suffered by the injured prosecution witness which were specifically ascribed to the accused fell according to medical report within the ambit of 5.337‑L(1) & (2), P.P.C. which entailed a maximum sentence of seven years' R.I. ‑‑‑Case of accused, therefore, was not hit by the prohibitory clause of S.497(1), Cr.P.C.‑‑ Accused was released on bail in circumstances. Hasnat Ahmad Khan for Petitioner. M. Jahangir Wahla, A.A.‑G. for the State. Petitioner seeks postarrest bail in case F. I. R. No.286, dated 9‑6‑1999, registered at Police Station Thikriwala, District Faisalabad for offences under section 324/109/34, P.P.C. Allegation against the petitioner is that he tired with pistol which hit Kashif on left thigh.

2. Learned counsel for the parties have been heard and record seen.

3. The nature of injuries noticed on the person of injured (P.W.) Kashif which are specifically ascribed to petitioner have been declared by Medical Officer as falling under purview of section 337‑L(i) and (ii) which would entail a maximum sentence of seven years. Case of the petitioner, prima facie would not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. The petitioner, as such is allowed bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court. N.H.Q./Q‑5/L Bail granted.