SCMR 1994

1994 PLP 1782 (SCMR)

AKBAR KHAN (deceased) through Rab Nawaz and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. KHAIR KHANUM and others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 340 of 1993, decided on 22nd November, 1993.
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1994 PLP 1782 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members N/A
Parties AKBAR KHAN (deceased) through Rab Nawaz and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. KHAIR KHANUM and others‑‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1782 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1782 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1782 (SCMR) (AKBAR KHAN (deceased) through Rab Nawaz and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. KHAIR KHANUM and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Representation

  • Sh. Zamir Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
  • Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) for Respondent No. 3.
  • Date of hearing: 22nd November, 1993.

Headnotes / Summary

(On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi, dated 21‑4‑1993, in C.R. 22 of .1978). Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S. 115‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether High Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction rightly interfered with concurrent findings of fact recorded by trial Court and affirmed in appeal by the First Appellate Court.

Judgment & Decree

MANZOOR HUSSAIN SIAL, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to consider, whether the learned High Court Judge, in exercise of Revisional jurisdiction in the instant case, rightly interfered with the concurrent .finding of fact recorded by the learned Civil Judge, Attock and affirmed in appeal by the learned District Judge, Attock. A.A./A‑1096/S Leave granted.