2004 P Cr (PLP)
FAISAL MUHAMMAD HASSAN and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2004 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Peshawar |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | FAISAL MUHAMMAD HASSAN and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Peshawar bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 P Cr (PLP) (FAISAL MUHAMMAD HASSAN and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Fida Gul for Petitioners.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.170/171/419/420/468/471-- Bail, grant of
Accused were in jail since their arrest and were no more required for the purpose of investigation
Charges against accused did not fall under the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C. and withholding of bail as a measure of advance punishment, would neither promote the cause of justice nor object of law
Element of fraud or dishonesty on the part of accused was yet to be determined during the trial
Investigation of the case was complete and challan of the case was likely to be put into the Court shortly
Judgment & Decree
Bail Application No.967 of 2003, decided on 26th September, 2003.
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.170/171/419/420/468/471-- Bail, grant of
Accused were in jail since their arrest and were no more required for the purpose of investigation
Charges against accused did not fall under the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C. and withholding of bail as a measure of advance punishment, would neither promote the cause of justice nor object of law
Element of fraud or dishonesty on the part of accused was yet to be determined during the trial
Investigation of the case was complete and challan of the case was likely to be put into the Court shortly
Conclusion of trial of accused would take some time
Accused were admitted to bail, in circumstances. Badrey and 3 others v. The State and another 2000 PCr.LJ 1914 and Abdul Qadir v. The State 1987 PCr.LJ 582ref. Fida Gul for Petitioners. Miss Naleem Khan for the State. Date of hearing; 26th September, 2003.