2006 P Cr (PLP)
SAJJAD alias SHADA — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | SAJJAD alias SHADA — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 P Cr (PLP) (SAJJAD alias SHADA — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Syed Muzaffar Abbas Kazmi for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497(2)
Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S.9(c)
Investigating Officer who appeared in the Court had stated that real accused lady who was arrested in some other case, had confessed that she had got planted Charas in question upon accused
Investigating Officer had further stated that said lady accused was involved in three other cases of narcotics
Since_accused had been found innocent during investigation, his case was of further inquiry
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner seeks bail after arrest in case F.I.R. No.13, dated 24-10-2005 under section 9(c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 registered at Police Station A.N.F., Multan.
2. The allegations against the petitioner as levelled in the F.I.R. are that on spy information that the petitioner was involved in the selling of narcotics and was about to go to somewhere to sell the narcotics a raiding party was constituted headed by Bashir Ahmad Inspector/S.H.O. Police Station A.N.F., Multan who apprehended the petitioner who was coming out of his house carrying a bag in his hand and on search 5 kilograms of Charas was recovered from the said bag. 3. learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner has been found innocent during the investigation conducted by the Assistant Director of A.N.F. Multan; that the petitioner is previously non-convict and no more required for further investigation of the case; that there is no convincing evidence on the record which connect the petitioner in this case and that during investigation it was found that it was Mst. Nausheen and Mirza Abdul Rauf Baig who were the real culprits and who had planted the Charas on the petitioner.
4. The last date of hearing we had directed appearance of Assistant Director A.N.F./Investigating Officer before this Court. He has entered appearance and stated that according to his investigation five kilograms Charas was planted upon the petitioner by Mst. Nausheen accused who was neighbour of the petitioner. He further stated that the petitioner in fact wanted to marry Mst. Bushra alias Piari, a sister of the said Mst. Nausheen which was not liked by her. Subsequently Mst. Nausheen was arrested in some other case and she confessed that she had got planted Charas upon the petitioner. He has further stated that the said Mst. Nausheen is involved in three other cases of narcotics.
5. Since the petitioner has been found innocent during the investigation, therefore, the case of the petitioner is one of further inquiry. He is, therefore, allowed bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./S-124/L Bail grante