2009 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD YOUNUS and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YOUNUS and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD YOUNUS and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.393/353/324/34
Complainant during the pendency of bail application had filed an affidavit in High Court stating therein that he had not made any statement as mentioned in the F.I.R. and he had disowned the same
State Counsel, in view of the said affidavit, did not object to grant of bail to accused
Judgment & Decree
MRS. YASMIN ABBASEY, J.
Granted. 2. and
3. On 24-9-2008, it was reported by complainant Pervez Ali that on that particular day, two persons on gun point asked him to hand over whatever he has in his possession. In the meanwhile, two police personnel on motorcycle were found coming there, accused persons made firing on them, police personnel also reverted in their defence, which injured both the culprits Muhammad Younus son of Muhammad Pannah and Ashiq Ali son of Peer Bakhsh. They were taken in custody along with the weapons and because of the injuries, were admitted in hospital. Subsequently, during the pendency of this bail application, an affidavit was filed by complainant Parvez Ali stating therein that no such statement, as alleged in the F.I.R., happened on 24-9-2008 and he has not reported at police station what has been stated in the F.I.R. On the basis of such affidavit, learned counsel for the State has no objection for the grant of this application. Accordingly, applicants are allowed to be released on bail subject to their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousands only) each, and P.R. Bonds in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. N.H.Q./M-5/K Bail granted.