1993 PCr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD DIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1993 PCr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD DIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PCr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PCr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PCr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD DIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.323
Suspension of sentence-- Accused had remained in jail for some time during the trial and had also undergone about a months' imprisonment
Appeal was not likely to be heard in the near future
Sentence of accused was suspended in circumstances and he was released on bail.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
S. 426
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.323
Suspension of sentence-- Accused had remained in jail for some time during the trial and had also undergone about a months' imprisonment
Appeal was not likely to be heard in the near future
Sentence of accused was suspended in circumstances and he was released on bail. Ch. Muhammad Ashraf Azeem for Petitioner. Arshad Khan for the State. The petitioner was convicted under section 323, P.P.C. and sentenced to undergo S.I: for two years for having caused simple injuries vide judgment dated 6-10-1991. He was acquitted of the charge under section 302/307/34, P.P.C., although two of his co-accused were convicted under section 302/34, P.P.C. and sentenced accordingly.
2. The sentence provided under section 323, P.P.C. is one year. I wonder wherefrom the learned trial Judge got the powers to sentence him for two years. He has remained in jail for some time during the trial and has also undergone about a month's imprisonment. There is no likelihood of the appeal coming up in the near future. The petition for suspension of sentence is, therefore, allowed. He shall be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.20,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Chunian. N.H.Q./M-613/L Sentence suspended.