1987 P Cr (PLP)
GHULAM FARID and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Khizar Hayat, J |
| Parties | GHULAM FARID and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khizar Hayat, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (GHULAM FARID and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307, 326 & 452/34‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Murderous assault‑‑Accused admittedly empty‑handed at time of occurrence‑‑Injured witness exonerating accused in his statement under S. 164, Cr.P. C. and stating, case registered due to misunderstanding‑‑Accused granted bail in circumstances. Iftikhar Fakhar, for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307, 326 & 452/34‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Murderous assault‑‑Accused admittedly empty‑handed at time of occurrence‑‑Injured witness exonerating accused in his statement under S. 164, Cr.P. C. and stating, case registered due to misunderstanding‑‑Accused granted bail in circumstances. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for Petitioner Iftikhar Fakhar, for the State. Muhammad Hussain, father‑in‑law of Nazir Ahmad injured witness lodged report at Police Station Jalalpur Pirwala against Shamir and Fida Hussain petitioners besides Ghulam Farid and Mehr Ali on the allegations that they made murderous assault on aforesaid Nazir Ahmad when he was sleeping near his cattle‑pen on the night between 10/11th July, 1986. The occurrence was allegedly witnessed by Ghaus Bakhsh and Muhammad Amin besides the complainant. The petitioners were arrested on 22‑7‑1986. The petitioners applied for the grant of bail in the lower Court but remained unsuccessful, hence, this application.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well for the State and also perused the record.
3. Admittedly, the petitioners were empty‑handed at the time of occurrence, therefore, no injury has been attributed to them. The injured witness namely Nazir Ahmad has stated before the Magistrate in his statement recorded under section 164, Cr.P.C. that the case against the petitioners was got registered due to misunderstanding. He does not implicate the petitioners as his assailants. In the circumstances, this petition is allowed. He is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Multan. S.A./G‑10/L Bail granted.