PLC(CS) 1992

1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

JAHAN KHAN Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALNAGAR and 2 others

Jurisdiction / Court
Service Tribunal Punjab
Decided Date
Appeal No. 780 of 1988, decided on 28th October, 1990.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Mahmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Malik Abdul Majid Member
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Service Tribunal Punjab
Bench Members Muhammad Mahmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Malik Abdul Majid Member
Parties JAHAN KHAN Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALNAGAR and 2 others
Primary Law Civil service
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Service Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Mahmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman and Malik Abdul Majid Member.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1992 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (JAHAN KHAN Versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALNAGAR and 2 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil service

Representation

  • MA. Riaz for Appellant.
  • A.G. Hamayun, District Attorney for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing: 28th October, 1990.

Headnotes / Summary

Annual Confidential Report

Adverse remarks

Expunction of adverse remarks

Appellant Deputy Superintendent of Police having been awarded adverse remarks, praying for expunction thereof on ground that they were based on mala fides which he failed to prove

During period under report appellant was found not only guilty of enjoying bad reputation for corruption but also for misuse of authority and lack of control over his subordinates-- Adverse remarks were not expunged.

Judgment & Decree

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAHAWALNAGAR and 2 others Appeal No. 780 of 1988, decided on 28th October, 1990.

Annual Confidential Report

Adverse remarks

Expunction of adverse remarks

Appellant Deputy Superintendent of Police having been awarded adverse remarks, praying for expunction thereof on ground that they were based on mala fides which he failed to prove

During period under report appellant was found not only guilty of enjoying bad reputation for corruption but also for misuse of authority and lack of control over his subordinates-- Adverse remarks were not expunged. MA. Riaz for Appellant. A.G. Hamayun, District Attorney for Respondents. Date of hearing: 28th October, 1990.