2000 PLP 2635(1) (YLR)
Mst. AASIA BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. FATIMA BIBI‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2000 PLP 2635(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Riaz Kayani, J |
| Parties | Mst. AASIA BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. FATIMA BIBI‑‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2000 PLP 2635(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2000 PLP 2635(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Riaz Kayani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2000 PLP 2635(1) (YLR) (Mst. AASIA BIBI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. FATIMA BIBI‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Hafiz Khalil Ahmad for Petitioner.
- Zahid Hussain Khan for Respondent.
Judgment & Decree
Hafiz Khalil Ahmad for Petitioner. Zahid Hussain Khan for Respondent. Ghulam Hussain for the State. Date of hearing: 27th January, 2000. Learned counsel states that he wants to give up respondent No.2 Muhammad Akram as the process‑serving agency has failed to effect service because of his abandonment of the last known address of abode. Name of Muhammad Akram son of Afzal Shah be deleted from the array of the respondents.
2. Mst. Aasia Bibi paternal grand‑' mother of Jamhir Shah has called in question', the order passed by Guardian Judge while issuing the warrants under section 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for production of minor on the ground that she does not have the custody of the minor and is being put to unnecessary harassment.
3. Mst. Aasia Bibi should appear before the learned Guardian Judge and satisfy the learned Judge that she does not have the custody and has no control over Muhammad Akram her son for production of the minor. Learned Guardian Judge is expected to pass a speaking order after contentions of Mst. Aasia and other concerns are taken into consideration. There is no force in this Criminal Miscellaneous bearing No.159/Q/1999 which is accordingly dismissed. N.H.Q./A‑105/L Petition dismissed.