1986 PLP 1511 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALI etc. — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1511 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslan Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALI etc. — Respondents |
| Primary Law | (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1511 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1511 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslan Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1511 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ALI etc. — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ghulam Sarwar with Rana Muhammad Sarwar Khan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Aitizaz Ahsan, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Aitzaz Ahsan, Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 31st May, 1986.
- Aitizaz Ahsan, Advocate Supreme Court and M.A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Mian Ataur Rehman, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.
- Aitzaz Ahsan, Advocate Supreme Court and Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 185(3)--Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417- Acquittal--Conclusion reached by High Court unexceptionable--Petition, having no force, dismissed.
Art. 185(3)--Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 5--Conviction--Petition barred by time and no good ground shown for condonation of delay- Petition dismissed as barred by time. Criminal Petition No. 274 of 1982 Mian Ataur Rehman, Advocate-on-Record for the State. Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 341 of 1982
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑This order will dispose of: (i) Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 274 of 1982, filed by Muhammad Anwar, against the acquittal of 8 accused respondents (in that petition) and (ii) Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 341 of 1982, filed by Muhammad Ali and Muhammad Hussain, against their conviction and sentences. Aslan Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah
2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner in Criminal Petition No. 274 of 1982, and went through the impugned judgment. We find ourselves in respectful agreement with the conclusion reached by the High Court and feel that the 8 respondents in Criminal Petition No. 274 of 1982 were rightly acquitted as such the petition is dismissed as having no merit.
3. As for Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 341 of 1982, it is time‑barred and no good ground has been shown for condonation of the delay. It is, therefore, dismissed as barred by time. M. Y. H. Petitions dismissed.